Almost Perfect Things....

(1) Urban/commuter bike: Kona Dew. Properties that the perfect commuter bike should possess: knobby road bike tires for efficiency, flat bar for comfort, NO shocks for weight/efficiency, and a very low price. I purchased a 2008 Kona Dew for $300 and it possess all those properties. I love it.

(2) Mountain bike: Specialized Stumpjumper. I have owned and ridden a number of mountain bikes, including full suspension and hard tail. For the type of riding I like to do -- riding up 1000-2000 verticle feet on fire roads and trails and then riding down single track -- a light weight hard tail is ideal. The stumpjumper, in my mind, gives you the best bang for your buck in the light weight hard tail catagory. You could upgrade to a stumpjumper pro or comp model, but I would save the money and just by a new stumpjumper a little bit sooner.

(3) Sunglasses: Smith Slider 01. Very light weight, very comfortable, and changable lenses. I've owned my pair for about 8 years and I still love them (although the are getting pretty scratched).

(4) Coffee Maker: Keurig B77. This coffee maker uses K-cup pods, which are expensive at about $0.50 each and they fill up the landfill, but, overall, it is so convient and the coffee is wonderful. I am just sick of cleaning the old coffee pot and love getting a nice cup of coffee at the push of a button in the morning when I am half awake.

(5) Bag: Timbuk2 Messenger Lapton bag. Very comfortable and useful. Perfect.

Funny...

From the NY Times regarding the potests around healthcare reform:

"There was a telling incident at a town hall held by Representative Gene Green, D-Tex. An activist turned to his fellow attendees and asked if they “oppose any form of socialized or government-run health care.” Nearly all did. Then Representative Green asked how many of those present were on Medicare. Almost half raised their hands."

Book Review: The Crossing by Cormac McCarthy

Let us begin by exploring what it means to describe a book as being part of a trilogy. I would expect that a trilogy of books would contain at least one common character, common geography, and sequential time periods. The common character requirement is probably the strongest, in my opinion. With this in mind, I decided to read "The Crossing" because I enjoyed "All the Pretty Horses", and I assumed the next book in the "Border Trilogy" would tell the story of what happened next to John Grady Cole. Wow, was I disappointed. As far as I could tell, there was no connection whatsoever between the two books -- no common characters, no common towns, no common time period. Just because two book are set on the border between the US and Mexico and they both have horses, does not mean they are a trilogy!

Beyond feeling deceived by the "Trilogy" description, I really did not enjoy this book at all. McCarthy's unique style that made "All the Pretty Horses" enjoyable was much weaker in this book. There were a few compelling pages in the book, but 90% of it was incredibly boring, overly dark, and just plain miserable drivel. I recommend skipping this book. Grade: D

Interesting Statistics

• Today's 1,125 billionaires hold more wealth than the wealth of half the world's adult population.
• The wealthiest 7 people on earth control more wealth than the combined GDP of the 41 poorest nations.

Are we okay with this? Are the strict capitalist ready to argue that the rich people worked 3,000,000 times harder than the poor? Source: The Hole in Our Gospel by Richard Stearns, President of World Vision.

Two Book Reviews

I read two books recently that are considered important classics in American Literature.

(1) All the Pretty Horses by Comack McCarthy -- My friend Dave recommended that I read a book by McCarthy because he is such an important figure in current literature. I told him that I strongly prefer books with happy endings, and he suggested "All the Pretty Horses". Dave may not realize this, but when the hero has to leave the love of his life and settle for a life of riding the deserts of the southwestern US --- THAT IS NOT A HAPPY ENDING!!! However, the book is one of the best I've ever read, which is especially remarkable when you consider that I hate books with unhappy endings and lots of horses. Very, very well written -- grade: A- (N.B., this is the first part of a trilogy that I plan to finish some day -- if the hero ends up with the girl, I'll give this book an A, and if he stops riding horses, I'll give it an A+).

(2) Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck -- this is a very short, character driven book. If you like books with interesting and unique individuals, and not much of a plot or suspense, this is the book for you. Grade: B-

My screen door saga....

I would like to thank Tiffany and Chris G. for their excellent customer service in helping me with my screen door issues. Chris G., in particular, should be referred to as "The Employee of the Month".

The Growing Cable Problem

There is a growing problem with cable television and the FCC needs to step in soon. Let me explain. First, all cable companies with wires (Comcast, Time Warner, etc.) and those without wires (DirectTV, etc.) have a finite amount of bandwidth. They cannot transmit 10,000 HD channels even if they wanted to. Therefore, they have to make choices, and that is where the problem starts. There are certain channels they must carry like ESPN and ABC, which happen to be owned by the same company. Now, when they are negotiating a price for ESPN and ABC with their parent company, the parent company says we will charge you $X for ESPN and $Y for ABC and we will throw in ESPN 2-10 and ABC 2-7 for FREE! The cable company probably doesn't want those 15 channels for free because they contain mostly crappy, unpopular content, but they do not have a choice since they must have ESPN and ABC. Now, why would the parent company throw in 15 channels for free --- especially when the content they carry is not completely free. Because, they know that Comcast et al can only carry so many channels, and by filling up their bandwidth with ESPN 2-10 they can indirectly force Comcast to drop potential upstart competitors to ESPN. The ABC/ESPN parent company is using their powerful channels to block possible competitors and gain a near monoply.

Solution: The FCC needs to step in an require: (1) ala cart channel availability to consumers, and, more importantly, (2) big content providers (i.e., ESPN) cannot bundle channels when negotiating with the cable companies --- they must negotiate a single price for ESPN, a different price for ESPN2, another for ESPN3, etc.